The Second Circuit ruled today that under federal law an unrepresented non-attorney may not sue on behalf of another person as guardian ad litem. But the Court vacated a district court ruling dismissing sua sponte the claim brought by the purported guardian on behalf of the other person because the other person was not properly represented. That is, a district court may not rule on the merits of a claim brought on behalf of someone by a non-attorney until an opportunity has been provided to the plaintiff to retain an attorney to represent the party on whose behalf the action was brought.
The case is Berrios v. NYC Housing Authority, No. 08-4832-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2009)
SCOVT reverses denial of post- judgment motion to reopen case for leave to
file an amended complaint, holding as a matter of first impression that
curing a pleading deficiency is a possible basis for relief under Rule
59(e) (following Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962).)
-
*Stowe Aviation, LLC v. Agency of Commerce,* 2024 VT 11 [February 23, 2024]
CARROLL, J. Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion to reope...
1 day ago