The Second Circuit ruled today that under federal law an unrepresented non-attorney may not sue on behalf of another person as guardian ad litem. But the Court vacated a district court ruling dismissing sua sponte the claim brought by the purported guardian on behalf of the other person because the other person was not properly represented. That is, a district court may not rule on the merits of a claim brought on behalf of someone by a non-attorney until an opportunity has been provided to the plaintiff to retain an attorney to represent the party on whose behalf the action was brought.
The case is Berrios v. NYC Housing Authority, No. 08-4832-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2009)
SCOVT reverses and enters summary judgment in favor of employee’s attorney,
holding that payment by insurer to employee’s attorney in settlement of
employee's personal-injury lawsuit against employer was not a “common
fund,” such that the law of unjust enrichment requires employee’s attorney
to contribute to employer’s attorney’s fees incurred in a separate suit
concerning insurance coverage for employee’s claim.)
-
*WWSAF Special Partners Group, LLC v. Costello, Valente & Gentry, P.C.*,
2025 VT 40 [7/18/2025]
CARROLL, J. This case involves a dispute between tw...
2 days ago
