The Second Circuit ruled today that under federal law an unrepresented non-attorney may not sue on behalf of another person as guardian ad litem. But the Court vacated a district court ruling dismissing sua sponte the claim brought by the purported guardian on behalf of the other person because the other person was not properly represented. That is, a district court may not rule on the merits of a claim brought on behalf of someone by a non-attorney until an opportunity has been provided to the plaintiff to retain an attorney to represent the party on whose behalf the action was brought.
The case is Berrios v. NYC Housing Authority, No. 08-4832-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2009)
Relief from judgment under Rule 60 is available only to parties -- even
though movant did not have notice and opportunity to become a party.
-
In Re Burchard Road Petition To Abandon Land Use Permit Denial, 2024 VT 51
(Neighbor, a party to the original act 250 proceeding who lives in New
Jer...
5 months ago