A defendant may remove a case from state court based on diversity of citizenship only if the complaint, notice of removal, or other evidence in the record provides “concrete information” that “the potential value of Plaintiff's claims” exceeds the amount in controversy required by
SCOVT reverses and enters summary judgment in favor of employee’s attorney,
holding that payment by insurer to employee’s attorney in settlement of
employee's personal-injury lawsuit against employer was not a “common
fund,” such that the law of unjust enrichment requires employee’s attorney
to contribute to employer’s attorney’s fees incurred in a separate suit
concerning insurance coverage for employee’s claim.)
-
*WWSAF Special Partners Group, LLC v. Costello, Valente & Gentry, P.C.*,
2025 VT 40 [7/18/2025]
CARROLL, J. This case involves a dispute between tw...
2 days ago
