The Second Circuit ruled today that under federal law an unrepresented non-attorney may not sue on behalf of another person as guardian ad litem. But the Court vacated a district court ruling dismissing sua sponte the claim brought by the purported guardian on behalf of the other person because the other person was not properly represented. That is, a district court may not rule on the merits of a claim brought on behalf of someone by a non-attorney until an opportunity has been provided to the plaintiff to retain an attorney to represent the party on whose behalf the action was brought.
The case is Berrios v. NYC Housing Authority, No. 08-4832-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2009)
SCOVT affirms summary judgment dismissing premises liability claim brought
on behalf of trespassing child, declining to adopt attractive nuisance
doctrine recognized in the Restatement, holding protection of children was
not “plain justification “ for overruling longstanding
no-duty-to-trespasser precedent that has fostered certainty, stability, and
predictability in Vermont’s landowner liability law.
-
* Premises Liability. Attractive Nuisance. Stare Decisi*s
Treadway v. Green Mountain Power Corporation, 2026 VT 20 [6/5/2026]
EATON, J. Plaintiff Ia...
2 weeks ago
