The Second Circuit ruled today that under federal law an unrepresented non-attorney may not sue on behalf of another person as guardian ad litem. But the Court vacated a district court ruling dismissing sua sponte the claim brought by the purported guardian on behalf of the other person because the other person was not properly represented. That is, a district court may not rule on the merits of a claim brought on behalf of someone by a non-attorney until an opportunity has been provided to the plaintiff to retain an attorney to represent the party on whose behalf the action was brought.
The case is Berrios v. NYC Housing Authority, No. 08-4832-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2009)
Legal expenses incurred in clearing title are “special damages” that can
sustain a slander-of-title claim
-
Massucco v. Kolodziej, 2024 VT 76 (filed 11/27/2024) (Affirms orders
reforming deed and finding slander of title, holding as a matter of first
impression...
4 days ago